I find it funny, that you referred to our signs as "Spam"
When originally spam was assigned after the word scam.
So am I to presume that you are calling our company fraudulent? Someone could take that as a slanderous comment. Also, to put up a sticker over our signs with such comments would also be slanderous. Wouldn't it?
We offer a legitimate product. We also recieve plenty of positive feedback and sales from our snipe posters. We are an honest company with a great reputation simply trying to build up profits. Or should we pass up on advertising simply because it is unsightly to you? In my personal opinion you are all high strung and need to realize WE WILL NOT STOP.
NOTICE: DUE TO YOUR LATEST ACTIVITIES IT IS NOW OUR COMPANY POLICY TO SPRAY A LAYER OF "RAPID REMOVER" OVER OUR SNIPE SIGNS. THIS WILL PREVENT ANYTHING ADHERING TO OUR SIGNS. THE ONLY WAY YOU WILL BE ABLE TO DEFICATE OUR SIGNS NOW IS BY USING A STAPLE GUN AND ETC.
BUT THAT WOULD JUST DEFEAT YOUR PURPOSE NOW WOULDN'T IT.
Thank you very much, Runik Director of Operation ****.com
PS WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF SNIPE POSTERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
#1. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 0
>I find it funny, that you referred to our signs as >"Spam" > >When originally spam was assigned after the word scam.
Actually, no it didn't. It was first "assigned" to unsolicited e-mail, and has propagated to many other forms of unsolicited advertising. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E-mail_spam for more details.
>So am I to presume that you are calling our company >fraudulent? Someone could take that as a slanderous comment.
Nope. See above.
>Also, to put up a sticker over our signs with such comments >would also be slanderous. Wouldn't it?
It would, if it meant what you think it meant. See above.
>We offer a legitimate product. We also recieve plenty of >positive feedback and sales from our snipe posters. We are an >honest company with a great reputation simply trying to build >up profits.
And the name of this legitimate, honest company is...?
> Or should we pass up on advertising simply because >it is unsightly to you?
No. You should pass up on advertising in an illegal manner because it is illegal.
> In my personal opinion you are all >high strung and need to realize WE WILL NOT STOP.
NEITHER WILL WE.
>NOTICE: DUE TO YOUR LATEST ACTIVITIES IT IS NOW OUR COMPANY >POLICY TO SPRAY A LAYER OF "RAPID REMOVER" OVER OUR >SNIPE SIGNS.
Heh. I consider myself a "RAPID REMOVER" of snipe signs.
>PS WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF SNIPE POSTERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I HAVE REMOVED THOUSANDS OF SNIPE POSTERS HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
#2. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 1
We know you wont stop. Why don't you play by the rules of 100s of other carpet cleaners, house buyers, computer repairers, sign business, ticket repairers ....
If the "honest" folks did what you find is boosting your profits , the town would look more trashed.
Do you notice the intersection around town with all those illegal ads?
Which ads get noticed? Answer: All, because they all trashing those intersections.
Keep your signs out of the landscape off stop signs and everywhere else your in "honest" violation with code in this town.
Yea you wont us to start removing them for you, we will. I personally been follow you scum around for awhile watching you trash the city.
Where do you wont us to start? Gowan@ElCapitan Nellis/Craig Cactus/Jones Hollywood/Owens Trop/Eastern Silverado/Blvd Rainbow/Robindale
It has nothing to do with a “scam”, however, because the history of this word “spam” is speculative and has numerous theories surrounding it, your idea seems fitting for you.
Hiding your reputable company name is not so reputable. I invite you to get free advertising right here on this website. Someone reading this may need what you have, and you can further boost the company’s profit. What is the complete web address?
#4. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 0
Quote= So am I to presume that you are calling our company fraudulent? -- Yes. And operating illegally.
Quote= Or should we pass up on advertising simply because it is unsightly to you? -- Yes. It is against the law and is littering.
Quote= WE WILL NOT STOP. -- I'll guarranty that I will not quit before you run out of money.
Quote= NOTICE: DUE TO YOUR LATEST ACTIVITIES IT IS NOW OUR COMPANY POLICY TO SPRAY A LAYER OF "RAPID REMOVER" OVER OUR SNIPE SIGNS. -- LOL... Funny. I remove all litter. I do not add to it.
Quote= BUT THAT WOULD JUST DEFEAT YOUR PURPOSE NOW WOULDN'T IT. -- I'm making a difference and cleaning up my part of the world. In fact, I'd say I defeat YOUR purpose.
.
Oh, there's a hint of cool in the air, and Winter is coming! I've got to gather more firewood... And Sign stakes make great fire starters!
#5. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 0
>NOTICE: DUE TO YOUR LATEST ACTIVITIES IT IS NOW OUR COMPANY >POLICY TO SPRAY A LAYER OF "RAPID REMOVER" OVER OUR >SNIPE SIGNS. THIS > > >PS WE HAVE THOUSANDS OF SNIPE POSTERS HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I wouldn't spray that stuff. It causes the signs to be rapidly removed. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHADDDDDDDDDDDDDD A THOUSAND SNIPE POSTERS.
#6. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 0
You are a director of a so-called "large company" and yet you are here posting "HAHAHA's" in capitol letters like a child. You are acting like a little boy who is not allowed to have candy. You are a little child and you were probably brought up without love and affection. Thats a shame my friend...stop pretending to be someone who you are not. Grow up little man.
#8. "RE: A clerification of the word "Spammer"" In response to Reply # 0 Thu Dec-06-07 07:35 PM by spamavenger
Not only is Runik a lawbreaker, he can't spell worth a damned.
The word is "clarification," not "clerification."
The other word is "defecate," not "deficate," and it means to poop. You can't "deficate" or "defecate" a sign unless you ate it and are now expelling it! I assume Runik means "deface."
Runik's lawbreaking and bad spelling tell me his company must be some bottom-feeding scheme. He sure doesn't sound like a corporate exec.